Exploring for the first time
You know it matters, you are not sure where it fits, and every piece of advice contradicts the last one.
I work with leaders, teams, educators and growing businesses that want to use AI properly and do not know where to start. Training, facilitation, and hands-on help putting the change in place.
English and Portuguese. Remote from anywhere, in person in Toronto, and yes, I travel.
Most people I meet are in one of three places. Pick the one that sounds like you and I will point you to the right way to work together.
You know it matters, you are not sure where it fits, and every piece of advice contradicts the last one.
One person on the team figured it out and nobody else did. You want that knowledge spread across the team.
You need a plan you can defend: what to adopt, in what order, with what guardrails, and who owns it.
Different rooms, same way of working. A stage and a microphone when the audience is large, one table and a stack of post-its when the work is detailed. In both cases people leave having worked something through themselves.
They differ in depth and in how many people are in the room. All of them start from the work your team actually does.
Suggested
FastestOne specific challenge, worked through live. You finish the session having made the decision.
For anyone who needs clarity this week.
Suggested
DeepestWe map where your time and money leak, pick one priority, and build it together until it runs without me.
For people who want the skill to stay in the team afterwards.
Suggested
TogetherGather your peers, your association or your network and learn as a group. The cost is shared, and a lot of the value comes from the discussion between participants.
For a group that would rather learn together than alone.
Suggested
For organizationsBrought in for your team or your event. From a keynote that shifts the conversation to a facilitated roadmap your leadership can sign off.
For organizations moving from literacy to adoption.
We start from the people doing the work and what actually gets in their way. You work during the session. I am not there to present slides at a room.
Choices get made against evidence, effort and impact. My background is in analytics, so I can check whether the numbers behind a claim hold up.
Adoption that respects the people affected by it. If AI does not belong in a process, I will tell you that.
Cross-functional groups only get somewhere when people say what they actually think. Most of my job in the room is making that possible.
These come from teaching and mentoring between 2017 and 2021, in Portuguese and in English, and I have left the dates on them on purpose. None of them are about artificial intelligence. They describe how a session runs and what someone walks out with, which has not changed since.
One to one mentoring, career restart
She came in with a product she had been circling for months and talking herself out of. Within a week of us finishing she had published, launched it and run her first class on it.
Watch Ana Rosa, 1 min
Design thinking course, group format
What stayed with her was being shown that genuinely complex problems can be worked out simply, and that the exchange with the other participants was worth as much as the material.
Watch Joyce, 1 min
Guest lecture, Corvinus University of Budapest
A master's student in communication and media studies, on a guest session in her negotiation class. She came out of it with practical direction on where to take a career.
Watch Sarah, 33 secEach of these was filmed by the person speaking, not by me. Eight are on YouTube, most of them in Portuguese.
"The future is already here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."William Gibson
This is the line I keep coming back to. The gap between organizations is not access anymore, because everyone has the same tools one tab away. What is missing is confidence, and that can be taught.
I started in journalism in Brazil, moved into digital when it was still a strange new department, and have been building marketing and content operations across four countries ever since. Somewhere along the way I realised that what I enjoy most is not writing the strategy document. It is watching someone stop being afraid of a tool they thought was beyond them.
I teach the way I wish someone had taught me: plainly, with real examples, and without pretending it is more complicated than it is. My training is in verification, so I am the person who will tell you when a tool is overpromising, and when the honest answer is that you do not need it.
Technology is easy to buy. Change is hard to lead.
Not at all. Small is often where it moves fastest, because there is nobody to convince and no process to unwind. I work with solo professionals as happily as with a leadership team.
Yes. Nothing I teach needs code. If you can describe how your work gets done, you can do this. Non-technical groups often get further, because they ask better questions.
Yes. Talks and conference sessions are part of what I do, in English or Portuguese, remote or in person. Write to me with the audience and the date.
Yes, and it is often the best value. Associations, peer groups and networks can share a cohort. Tell me roughly how many people and what you all have in common.
That is not the work I do. The point is to take the repetitive parts off a person's plate so their time goes to the work that needs a human.
Yes. I am based in Toronto and work remotely worldwide. I have delivered live training in eight cities across four continents.
Then I will say so. That is a legitimate outcome of a first conversation, and telling you otherwise would cost me more than it earns.
Curious about building clarity, confidence and practical momentum with AI? Write a few lines. I reply with a straight answer, including whether I am the right person for it.
Prefer to talk instead of write? Say so and I will send you some times.